We publish every error that changed a number you could see,
what caused it and what now guards against it.
Corrections
26 September 2026The insider-buying backtest used unadjusted prices
The study read raw closing prices, so every stock split looked like a crash or a jump and dividends were missing. Re-run on split- and dividend-adjusted prices, all open-market purchases against the Russell 2000 over 90 days moved from -0.62% to -0.11% (median -1.76%, 45.4% of purchases beat the index). The page also called the old figure statistically significant; that sentence is now computed from the numbers, and at t = -0.8 it is not. The conclusion did not change: bought blindly, insider purchases are not an edge.
25 September 2026Amended Form 4 filings were counted twice
When an insider files a Form 4/A it restates the whole transaction. We stored both the original and the amendment, so 12,401 purchases and sales were counted twice. The largest visible case: Jefferies (JEF) showed $1.3B of insider buying in 180 days instead of $677M. Restated originals are now removed every day before any figure is built, and the 20 largest figures on the site are re-checked each morning for this pattern.
No password to create and no card required. We store your email address and nothing else.
PRIVACY & COOKIES
We track filings, not you.
Essential cookies keep you signed in. Google Analytics
loads only if you allow it here, to show us which datasets matter.
No ad trackers, ever. Details in the privacy
policy.